Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: archivemovie123 Date: Jan 10, 2012 7:29am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: Are these PD? Moongleam? VideoCellar?

I'm sorry, but it has been so long since I have posted to the archive that I have forgotten how to read the copyright record. Are you both saying that these were renewed? Is that what the R423834 means in Hi Yo Silver?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Moongleam Date: Jan 10, 2012 7:30pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: Are these PD? Moongleam? VideoCellar?

Video-Cellar is showing that HI-YO SILVER's copyright was renewed in 1967. It is not in the public domain.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: archivemovie123 Date: Jan 12, 2012 12:30pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: Are these PD? Moongleam? VideoCellar?

Didn't films have to be renewed in their 28th year? The Renewal for HiYoSilver is only 27 years. Could that make the renewal invalid?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: archivemovie123 Date: Jan 10, 2012 7:59pm
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: Are these PD? Moongleam? VideoCellar?

Thank you so much, I understand now.

Am I correct in understanding that CornyPop is showing that the Mountie film is PD?

This post was modified by archivemovie123 on 2012-01-11 03:59:41

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: anh Mike Date: Jan 13, 2012 4:45am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: Are these PD? Moongleam? VideoCellar?

K. of Mounties according to Corny pop shows no renewal and supports serialsquadron's claim to PD status. It's ok to post. Surprise that alpha did not release a copy.